Sheyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York, Columbia University Press, , pp. xv. Sheyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the. Foundations of Critical Theory. New York, Columbia University Press, , pp. xv, , $ Critique, Norm, and Utopia has 24 ratings and 3 reviews. Displaying an impressive command of complex materials, Seyla Benhabib reconstructs the history of.
|Published (Last):||11 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||19.41 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory by Seyla Benhabib
Return to Book Page. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: Displaying an impressive command of complex materials, Seyla Benhabib reconstructs the history of theories from a systematic point of view and examines the origins and transformations of the concept of critique from the works of Hegel to Habermas.
Paperbackpages. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Critique, Norm, and Utopiaplease sign up.
Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory
Be the first to ask a question about Critique, Norm, and Utopia. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Nov 03, Brendan rated it it was amazing. I totally concur with Peter Gathje’s review.
I had this book on my shelf for years without reading it. I attended a very critical theory rich graduate school in philosophy and think it may be even more meaningful and useful to me now as it could have been then.
The criticisms she offers at each stage of the main theoretical appropriations I totally concur with Peter Gathje’s review. The criticisms she offers at each stage of the main theoretical appropriations of a general critical theory of society by Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas are clear and thoughtful. The positive recommendations she argues for in extending critical theory are well-founded. Benhabib argues that we can embrace and extend the communicative ethics laid out by Jurgen Habermas.
Her suggestion to modify the theory of communicative action to integrate a concept of, and practices with regard to, a ‘concrete as opposed to a generalized other’ lead her in very interesting nnorm. Specifically she calls upon critical theory to integrate into its conceptual framework ideas of ‘friendship’ and ‘solidarity’ and other conceptual discriminations of the ‘concrete’ benhablb, felt, and lived experience of human subjects.
She applies her admirably sharp and focused critical skills to unpacking the consequences of Habermas’ adaptation of Mead’s concept of the ‘generalized other’.
I think that perhaps her discussion of Adorno is a bit quick with regard to the turn to Mimesis and aesthetics as the location of emanicpation.
That is, I think Adorno might have something a bit more to say in retort to her critique that he is still operating under the pretensions of ‘the philosophy of the subject’ especially in light of the dialectical unpacking of the art object and its potential in Aesthetic Theory.
And while this is welcome and persuasive as a critique of Habermas, I think scholarship regarding Mead and Dewey in the 26 years since Benhabib’s book shows that the concrete other was very much a part of their own critical theories of democracy. That is, as we see in such works as Dewey’s The Public and Its Problems, ‘solidarity’, ‘friendship’, ‘need’ and the ‘concrete other’ are very much present alongside a demystifying critique of the colonization of the lifeworld by ‘instrumental reason’ in Weber’s sense.
Axel Honneth and Hans Joas in particular have shown this to be the case. But this is just to say that Benhabib has allies in Mead and Dewey with regard to achieving a situtation where the ‘negation of the existent in the name of a future that bursts open the possibilities of the present’.
Indeed, as Joas has shown, this is Dewey’s understanding of critique in a nutshell.
Dec 27, Michael rated it it was amazing. This is one the best interpretations of Critical Theory and Habermas’ approach to critical theory going. I used this text as an interpretative approach to understanding several of Habermas’ works.
It is accessible, straighforward and one of the better books available on critical theory. Sep 17, Andrew rated it it was amazing. Benhabib is an exceptionally clear thinker, and here she takes us through the frustrating terrain of the normativity of critical social theory. It contains a great explanation of crihique Habermas is trying to do, and how he is differentiated from his predecessors like Hegel, Marx and the Frankfurt School. It also contains a searching criticism of Habermas’ critiique ethics Where Benhabib accuses Habermas of falling back into the same kinds of problems of his predecessors when he must use philoso Benhabib is an exceptionally clear thinker, and here she takes cgitique through the frustrating terrain of the normativity of critical social theory.
Where Benhabib accuses Habermas of falling back into the same kinds of problems of his predecessors when he must use philosophically historical narratives to privilege his universal pragmatics over other contemporary post-traditional approaches. Todd rated it liked it May 15, Gilbert rated it really liked it Oct 03, SyphilisVictim rated it it was ok Dec 27, William Hackman rated it liked it Jul 01, Sandra rated it it was amazing Jun 22, Newton rated it it was amazing Mar 19, Mans Ali rated it really liked it Nov 28, David Anderson rated it it was amazing Feb 19, Carlos rated it it was amazing Jan 09, Kelly rated it it was amazing Dec 08, Spencer McKay rated it liked it Sep 10, Abysses rated it really liked it Feb horm, Pavel rated it it was amazing Mar 20, Maggie rated it it critiqye amazing Apr 30, Stentor rated it liked it Dec 28, Sebastian rated it really liked it Sep 18, Ageel Ali rated benuabib really liked it May 04, Gina Eom rated it really liked it Feb 27, Sarah rated it it was amazing May 22, Nythamar De Oliveira rated it really liked it Jul 15, Nabil added it Sep 06, Lara Fresko marked it as to-read Apr 13, Adam marked it as to-read May 04, Tina marked it as to-read Jun 25, Alexander Struk marked it bennabib to-read Aug 12, Clara marked it as to-read Sep 19, Chris Buck added it May 06, Diego marked it as to-read Jul 16, Tom Schneitter marked it as to-read May 20, Funda marked it as to-read Jul norrm, Louis Colombo marked it as to-read Nov 04, Mark Fitzpatrick marked it as to-read Nov 25, Yasemin added it Normm 12, Jon Gagas marked it as to-read May 23, Bryan added it May 28, Tiago Porto marked it as to-read Aug critqiue, Minkah marked it as to-read Aug 31, Kevin Yang marked it as to-read Sep 02, Ozgur is utoipa reading it Sep 09, critqiue Esma marked it as to-read Dec 20, Leah marked it as to-read Jan 07, Muhammad Alfan marked it as to-read Jan 09, Nicholas added it Jan 25, Joonas marked it as to-read Jan 31, Paul marked it as to-read Mar 10, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Seyla Benhabib is a Turkish Jewish professor of political science and philosophy at Yale, and director of the program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, and a well-known contemporary philosopher. She is the author Seyla Benhabib is a Turkish Jewish professor of political science and philosophy at Yale, and director of the program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, and a well-known contemporary philosopher. She has also worked utooia many important philosophers and scholars, including Herbert Marcuse.
Radical Philosophy Critique Norm Utopia Archive
Benhabib is well known for combining critical theory with feminist theory. Books by Seyla Benhabib. Trivia About Critique, Norm, a No trivia or quizzes yet.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.