ISO gives requirements for non-powered working platforms and walkways which are a part of a stationary machine, and to the non-powered. ISO (E). © ISO INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO. BS – Impact absorbing playground surfacing. BS EN ISO Safety of machinery – Permanent means of access to machinery Part 2: Working platforms and walkways.
|Published (Last):||13 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||1.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
BS EN ISO 14122-2:2016
It may seem strange that permanent means of access to machinery are related to machine guarding but, in fact, they are. Means of access, as with guarding, help to control access to machine-related hazards under different circumstances — such as operation, cleaning and maintenance — and should not themselves introduce significant new risks.
As with guards, when considering means of access the first approach should be to design-out the risks. For example, rather than require an access point so that lubrication points can be fn, lubrication points should be made accessible from ground level or a lubrication circuit and pump could be installed.
The previous editions cease to provide a presumption of conformity to the Machinery Directive on 31 December The four parts are all B-Type standards, meaning they deal with specific aspects of machinery safety and can be applied to a wide range of categories of machinery. 141222-2 four parts are, in full:.
Readers who are concerned kso what changes might occur in relation to standards once the UK leaves the European Union can rest assured that it is unlikely that there will be any change here because BS EN ISO is equivalent to the bd standard and it is all but inconceivable that the UK would cease to use this.
Remember that compliance with standards is not mandatory but is strongly recommended. For b new machine that is being CE marked to the Machinery Directiveworking to the standard gives a presumption of conformity to the relevant EHSRs; without the standard, it is necessary to demonstrate that the EHSRs have been fulfilled by some other means. A final point to note is that ISO Part 5 is in preparation, which will deal with permanent iwo of access on mobile machinery. A permanent means of access is fixed to the machine or an adjacent structure in such a way that it cannot be removed without the use of tools.
As well as applying to rigidly attached means of access, the standard also applies to non-powered adjustable or movable parts such as sliding isp folding ladders.
Furthermore, the standard applies to parts of the building or civil construction if the main function of these is to provide isl to the machine. For the purposes of BS EN ISOpermanent means of access are working platforms, walkways, stairs, stepladders, guard rails and fixed ladders.
However, the scope of the standard specifically excludes powered means of access lifts, escalators or other devices designed to move lso between levels. Part 1 contains useful definitions, such as those for fixed ladder, stepladder, stair and ramp essentially the differences relate to the angle of pitch, and ladders have rungs whereas stepladders and stairs have steps.
When most people refer to stepladders they probably mean a short ladder with folding legs that enable it to be free-standing. Clause 4 of Part 1 lists the most significant hazards to consider when determining the type and location of the means of access. An additional note draws attention to other possible hazards, and the reader is also reminded of ISO relating to risk assessments. Where there are hazards not covered by the standard, such as moving parts of machinery, extreme temperatures or hazards caused by the environment, the standard says that these should be considered and addressed by, for example, preventing unauthorised access.
In other words, when designing and specifying means of access, consideration should be given to preventing unauthorised access. One issue that is not addressed particularly well in the standard is the question of under what circumstances a permanent means of access is required, though an ISO risk assessment will help. Furthermore, three-point contact needs to be maintained except for very brief periods eg starting a screwheavy objects should not be carried, leaning ladders should be secured and, if stepladders are used and side loads are imposed, then the stepladder should be secured.
In general, if it is anticipated that regular access will be required for machine operation, cleaning or maintenance, then a permanent means of access hs be given due consideration see bbs Clause 5 below.
Furthermore, a permanent means of access can prove to be very cost-effective compared with the cost of erecting scaffolding on multiple occasions. Clause 5 lists the general requirements for design and construction of means of access. Note that subclause fn. References are made to other subclauses that help in determining which type of access should be selected, but the point to note is io there must be good reasons for using any means of access other than those listed higher up the hierarchy.
Following on from the above, subclause 6. Annex A gives examples of changes that can be made to the machine or system to make better access ne.
White Paper 7 – BS EN ISO | Free Downloads | Procter Machine Safety
Annex B lists the significant technical changes between ISO However, it is almost inevitable that Part 3 will also be required, because this covers the guard-rails that are usually necessary with platforms and walkways.
Interestingly, a pragmatic approach is adopted, with several exceptions allowed under particular circumstances. However, great care should be taken with ribbed ramps, bearing in mind that subclause 4. Nevertheless, it would be prudent to verify 14122–2 safety requirements either by calculation or testing. Annex A izo to methods for determining 1412-2 resistance and starts by stating that no international standard currently exists. If guard-rails are being installed alongside platforms or walkways, Part 3 will have to be used in conjunction with Part 2 as well.
Another point to note from the definitions is that handrails bx be rigid, which excludes the use of ropes, chains or cables. Clause 4 presents the General requirements for stairs, stepladders and guard-rails, including the loadings to be used in strength and deflection calculations when designing these structures. Clause 5Specific requirements applicable to stairsprovides further information for designing stairs.
Some leeway is provided for designers, as shown by this example from subclause 5.
BS EN ISO 14122-2:2001+A1:2010
iiso Clause 6Specific requirements applicable to step laddersprovides similar details to those in Clause 5. Clause 7Specific requirements applicable to guard-railsstates that guard-rails shall be installed when the height of the possible fall exceeds mm, if the gap between the platform and machine structure exceeds mm 1412-2 if the protection provided by the structure is not equivalent to a guard-rail.
However, the same subclause states that the minimum height of the guard-rail shall be mm, so it appears that the former may be a typographical error and the height of the handrail should be greater than or equal to mm. As well as providing requirements for guard-rails on platforms, stairs and stepladders, Clause 7 also gives details for toe plates, 14122-2 gates and mezzanine gates.
Clause 8Verification of safety requirementsgives a choice of testing or calculation. The clause goes on to provide details of how to test guard-rails and the steps of a stair. For testing stepladders, the reader is referred to ENLadders. If the designer chooses to verify the safety requirements by calculation, the information relating to the test methods must be taken into account so that the two verification methods are comparable.
Clause 4Selection and design of ladder systems, provides some of the information required by the designer, but more is contained in Clause 5. Clause 5Specific requirements of ladder systemsprovides extensive information relating to ladder design, including the profiles and dimensions of rungs round rungs are not permitted.
Earlier this White Paper mentioned the need to prevent unauthorised access. If an anti-climb device is fitted to a ladder, a written warning or audible signal is not adequate for access control.
However, see Clause 6 below. Clause 6, Verification of safety requirementsappears to contradict subclause 5. Annex ARequirements for the design of anti-climb devices, is normative and bz, therefore, be complied with often an Annex to a standard is informative only. General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards. There is no option in the Annex for verifying the safety requirements by calculation. Annex B informative illustrates the main dimensions of a fixed ladder equipped with a safety cage.
Annex C lists the significant technical changes between ISO Procter Machine Guarding offers free Machine Guarding Compliance Surveys of standalone machinery and assemblies of machines, old or new, and can also assess permanent means of access. As part of the free survey, the safety engineers provide 141222 short written report that identifies areas of non-compliance and actions that eb be taken to reduce risk, improve safety and comply with PUWER.
ENMinimum Gaps to Avoid Crushing Explaining the requirements of the standard for minimum gaps to prevent crushing. Conveyor Guarding Explaining the hazards associated with conveyors, regulations and standards, and how to safeguard conveyors without adversely affecting productivity. Free Machine Accident Investigation Kit To help companies meet their statutory obligations and prevent future accidents.
Free Ergonomics Guidance European Commission publication Guidance on the application of the essential health and safety requirements on ergonomics. Sign up to our newsletter for regular email updates on the latest Guarding news and products. Our site requires cookies to function, click here for more information Ok, thank you. More about your enquiry.