Sorry, sorry gif siemens vfd catalogue pdf download medical signs argentina nationalization of ypf serviclub hey rosetta. herzliche dank im voraus gross. Los premios que ofrece este increíble club de socios exclusivo de YPF se pueden ver en la sección catálogo YPF Serviclub y así poder ver porque beneficio. Check traffic ranks, site worth and etc. Catalogo YPF Serviclub . Creation Date: TZ Registrar Registration Expiration.
|Published (Last):||16 January 2013|
|PDF File Size:||10.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That the content of the web page to which the disputed domain name resolves, resembled and imitated an official YPF website, a fact that adds to the confusing similarity.
The Respondent did not file a formal response. The Registrar confirmed to the Center that the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent on July 9, In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5 athe due date for Response was December 14, Under paragraph 4 c of the Policy, rights or legitimate interests in a domain name may be demonstrated by showing that:.
The Panel verified this circumstance by visiting the webpage to which the disputed domain name resolves. Joseba Menoyo Case No. In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 a and 4 athe Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on November 24, The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on November 20, On November 19,the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint.
Artificial Intelligence Universities Gender Equality. Moreover, the Respondent was apparently making a commercial use of the disputed domain name most likely by profiting from the advertisements that were displayed on the website to which it resolved.
Complainant The Complainant made the following submissions in the Complaint: Therefore, the Panel finds that the requirement of paragraph 4 a i of the Policy is satisfied. Paragraph 4 c of the Policy sets forth the following examples as circumstances where a respondent may have rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name:.
Catalogo ypf serviclub descargar whatsapp download
D ; AutoNation, Inc. The Center appointed Kiyoshi Tsuru as the sole panelist in this matter on January 8, D ; Six Continents Hotels, Inc. However, the Complainant did not provide sufficient evidence to support these allegations, which is why this argument is dismissed.
Discussion and Findings A. Visit Us Catalogp Us. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on November 20,providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint.
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
Factual Background The Complainant is a stock corporation organized under the laws of Argentina, dedicated to the exploration and production of oil and gas and to the transportation, refining and marketing of gas and petroleum products. Moreover, in determining the similarity of two marks, points of similarity are weighed more heavily than points of difference.
In addition, the Complainant owns the following domain name registrations: The Complainant is a stock corporation organized under the laws of Argentina, dedicated to serbiclub exploration and production of oil and gas and to the transportation, refining and marketing of gas and petroleum products.
Artificial Intelligence Universities Gender Equality. The notarial deed found in Exhibit 13 shows that on the web site to which the disputed servkclub name resolved, the Respondent displayed some advertisement links that most likely generated pay per click revenue in her favor. Modern Empire Internet Ltd. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
YPF Trademarks are extremely well known in Argentina and other South American countries […] appears in TV commercials, advertisements in newspapers, webpages and magazines, billboards in the streets, etc.
The second requirement of the Policy has caralogo fulfilled. The Respondent did not submit any response. The addition of a generic term to a famous mark is not sufficient to avoid confusion. That the YPF serviclub program currently includes more than seven hundred thousand active participants. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. That there is convincing evidence mainly a notarial deed of the content of the web catapogo to which the disputed domain name resolves demonstrating that the Respondent was trying cataligo imitate the website of the YPF serviclub program.
In light of the above, the Panel concludes that the Respondent catxlogo and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. That Internet users xerviclub believe that there caralogo a connection between the disputed domain name and the YPF serviclub program and its catalogue of benefits. The Panel finds that the Complainant has used and registered its trademark in different countries and for a long period of time, predating all the trademark registrations date the date of registration of the disputed domain name.
In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 a and 4 athe Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on November 24, The disputed domain name is currently inactive.
Rights or Legitimate Interests Under paragraph 4 c of the Policy, rights or legitimate interests in a domain catalogk may be demonstrated by showing that: The Complainant argues that the Respondent has registered thirty three other domain names that potentially infringe the intellectual property of other companies, and that the Respondent has engaged in a pattern of registering the corporate or trade names of third parties with which the Respondent has no connection, a situation that constitutes bad faith under paragraph 4 b ii of the Policy.
Visit Us Contact Us. On November 18,the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. The third element of the policy has been fulfilled. D ; and Parfums Christian Dior v. Catalovo The Complainant argues the following: On this basis, the Panel finds that the Respondent failed to produce any evidence to establish rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
Kiyoshi Tsuru Sole Panelist Date: On November 18,the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. Registered and Used in Bad Faith According to paragraph 4 b of the Policy, the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, shall be evidence of registration and use in bad faith: