ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS PARASITOLOGIA. Diagnóstico sorológico de erliquiose canina com antígeno brasileiro de Ehrlichia canis. Serological diagnosis of. 5 jun. Introdução Erliquiose Canina Picada do carrapato Conclusão Argélia – Patogenia Hematologia – anemia arregenerativa Diagnóstico Uso. Erliquiose canina. 92 likes. A erliquiose canina é uma importante doença infecciosa transmitida pelo carrapato Rhipicephalus sanguineus (carrapato marrom).
|Published (Last):||9 October 2015|
|PDF File Size:||14.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canisEhrlichia equiand in sick dogs from North Carolina and Virginia. These researchers collected samples from dogs treated at the Veterinary Hospital of the State University of Santa Cruz and in private veterinary clinics, as well as from domestic dogs through random home visits.
Ehrlichia chaffeensis Blastocerus dichotomus Vet Parasitol ; Ehrlichiosis is a zoonotic disease that is caused by bacteria of the genus Ehrlichia. The cell culture showed to be infected by Ehrlichia on day 27 by PCR and on day 28 by cytological staining.
Serological diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis with Brazilian antigen of Ehrlichia canis
For each house visited, a maximum of two dogs were evaluated. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootv.
When comparing the sensitivity and specificity of the blood-smear and serologic techniques, we noted that the chances of false-negative results with the blood-smear technique were high, whereas the chances of false positives were low. Molecular and serological detection of spp.
Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: Esta amostra de E. Ehrlichia J Wildl Dis ; 46 3: Some factors may predispose dogs to disease development, such as older age, the presence of and erlkchiose with other dogs, living in urban habitats, and exposure to R.
Anaplasmataceae in dogs and Acari: Introduction Ehrlichiosis is an infectious disease that is caused by a gram-negative bacterium of the genus Ehrlichiawhich includes species such as E. Ticks Tick Borne Dis ; 3 4: Ehrlichia canisisolation, DH82, immunofluorescence, serology.
Journal Small Animal Practicev. Of the positive animals, 20 In Vitro Cell Dev Biolv. According to Azevedo et al. Rev Infect Dis ; 10 Suppl 4: The occurrence of R.
Rev Bras Parasitol Vetv. Additionally, dogs from rural areas hada lower probability of acquiring the disease compared with dogs from urban areas, a result that was also observed by Aguiar et al. Canis familiares Ensaios e Cienc ; 12 2: Services on Demand Journal.
Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Erlihciose in the order Rickettsiales: Molecular studies indicate that new strains of Ehrlichia spp. The aims of this study were to detect the presence of Ehrlichia spp. Services on Demand Journal. Discussion This study found that BMJ ; Sero-prevalence and risk indicators for canine ehrlichiosis in three rural areas of Brazil.
Detection of in Brazilian marsh deer. On the IFA and nested-PCR test, 70 dogs were positive with the first diagnostic technique and negative with the erlichioss, whereas 43 dogs were positive with the second technique and negative with the first Figure 1.
Clinical and molecular evaluation of dogs with ehrlichiosis
Clinical and molecular evaluation of dogs with ehrlichiosis. In addition to the above mentioned points, because serological testing identifies only antibodies, a positive case on erlichiode may appear negative on PCR testing because of eradication of the Ehrlichia organisms by the immune system. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Rhipicephalus sanguineus J Med Entomol ; 44 1: Molecular and erlichiowe detection of spp. Canine monocytic ehlichiosis presenting as acute blindness 36 months after importation into the UK.
Studies of canine ehrlichiosis have become the focus of several research programs within Brazil. The transmission of ehrlichiosis by the tick vector requires the presence of an infected dog, so increased contact between dogs increases the chances of exposure to a tick vector infected with E.
The results obtained in this study support the conclusion that the methods are complementary, because the different diagnostic techniques exhibited differences in the sensitivity and specificity for different stages of infection. In contrast, the animals studied by Carlos et al.